DiaphragmCalc

Model and assumptions

DiaphragmCalc is a first-order analytical design tool. Results are analytical estimates and should be independently validated (FEA and test) before use in safety-critical or production designs. It is not FEA and not certified engineering software.

All calculations use SI units internally (m, Pa, kg/m³, V). The UI converts from µm, mm, kPa, bar, MPa, psi, GPa.

1. Geometry and boundary conditions

ItemAssumption
ShapesSquare (side a) and circular (radius a; the UI takes diameter)
EdgesFully clamped: zero deflection and zero slope
PlateHomogeneous, isotropic, linear-elastic Kirchhoff thin plate
LoadUniform differential pressure q on one face
Residual stressNone
Valid rangea/h ≥ ~10 (thin plate); w₀/h ≤ ~0.2 for linear results

2. Equations

Flexural rigidity: D = E h³ / [12 (1 − ν²)]
QuantitySquare (side a)Circular (radius a)Source
Centre deflection w₀0.00126 q a⁴ / Dq a⁴ / (64 D)Timoshenko & Woinowsky-Krieger (1959), Table 35; §63
Edge stress σ_L (normal to edge, surface, mid-edge)0.3078 q (a/h)²0.75 q (a/h)²same; square coefficient from M = 0.0513 q a²
Edge stress parallel to edge σ_Tν σ_Lν σ_Lzero curvature along a clamped edge
First resonance f₀35.99 /(2π a²) √(D/ρh)10.21 /(2π a²) √(D/ρh)Leissa (1969), NASA SP-160

Notes:

3. Large-deflection estimate

Circular plate (Timoshenko, energy method, ν = 0.3):

w₀/h + 0.488 (w₀/h)³ = q a⁴ / (64 D h)

Implemented as q a⁴/(E h⁴) = K₁ x + K₂ x³ with x = w/h, K₁ = 1/[c_w · 12(1 − ν²)] (c_w = linear deflection coefficient), K₂ = 0.488 K₁, solved by Newton iteration.

For the square plate the same K₂/K₁ = 0.488 ratio is assumed. This is an engineering estimate, not a published solution for the clamped square plate; treat square-plate nonlinearity as indicative only.

"Nonlinearity %" is the deflection nonlinearity (w_lin − w_NL)/w_lin at full scale. It is not the same as the terminal-based or best-fit-straight-line output nonlinearity on a datasheet, which is typically smaller and also includes stress and bridge nonlinearity.

4. Piezoresistive transduction

ItemAssumption
Materialp-type Si, resistors along ⟨110⟩ on a (100) wafer
Coefficientsπ₄₄ = 138.1 × 10⁻¹¹ Pa⁻¹ (Smith 1954), π_l = π₄₄/2, π_t = −π₄₄/2 (π₁₁, π₁₂ neglected)
DopingMultiplier P(N) ≈ 1.0 / 0.97 / 0.85 / 0.60 / 0.30 at 10¹⁶ … 10²⁰ cm⁻³, 300 K (read from Kanda 1982; approximate)
Resistor sizeMultiplier "stress averaging" ≤ 1 (1 = point resistor at the peak)
PlacementRadial resistor sees (σ_L, σ_T); tangential resistor sees (σ_T, σ_L)
BridgeFull Wheatstone bridge, two resistors +x, two −y: V_out/V_in = (x − y)/(2 + x + y)
TemperatureNot modelled

Material presets for E and ν are for the plate model only. The piezoresistive model is valid for p-type single-crystal silicon; the polysilicon preset uses the same coefficients and will over-predict sensitivity (polysilicon gauge factors are much lower).

5. Fluid loading

Added virtual mass incremental factor (Lamb 1920; Amabili & Kwak 1996):

β = Γ ρ_f a / (ρ h), Γ = 0.6689 (clamped circular plate, first mode, fluid on one side), f_wet = f₀ / √(1 + β)

Square plates use the equal-area radius a/√π. The model assumes an unbounded, incompressible fluid. Thin oil gaps, cavity compliance, isolation diaphragms and damping are not included.

6. Warnings raised

7. What requires FEA

Anisotropic silicon stiffness; KOH sidewall/anchor compliance; bossed, corrugated or multilayer diaphragms; residual stress; resistor geometry and stress gradients; package, die-attach and thermal-mismatch stress; temperature coefficients; dynamic response with a real fluid cavity; burst prediction beyond linear bending.

References

  1. S. Timoshenko, S. Woinowsky-Krieger, Theory of Plates and Shells, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1959.
  2. A. W. Leissa, Vibration of Plates, NASA SP-160, 1969.
  3. C. S. Smith, "Piezoresistance effect in germanium and silicon", Phys. Rev. 94, 42 (1954).
  4. Y. Kanda, "A graphical representation of the piezoresistance coefficients in silicon", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 29, 64 (1982).
  5. H. Lamb, "On the vibrations of an elastic plate in contact with water", Proc. R. Soc. A 98, 205 (1920).
  6. M. Amabili, M. K. Kwak, "Free vibrations of circular plates coupled with liquids: revising the Lamb problem", J. Fluids Struct. 10, 743 (1996).
  7. W. C. Young, R. G. Budynas, Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, 7th ed.